{
  "schema": "vedokrok.public-item.v1",
  "release_id": "MHC-RPUB-20260920-75ad787a",
  "url": "/knowledge/track-the-next-two-opportunities-not-the-next-six-months",
  "id": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-0600",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "title": "Track the next two opportunities, not the next six months",
  "summary": "Early repetition tells you whether the change is becoming operational.",
  "kind": "protocol",
  "body": "Identify the next one or two real opportunities where the target behavior should appear. Observe or inspect the output, then give a short update: changed, partly changed, or blocked. Stop tracking once the behavior is reliably integrated or redefine the problem if it is not.",
  "limits": [
    "Avoid surveillance disproportionate to the issue; track only what is needed for the agreed change."
  ],
  "topics": [
    "union-feedback-to-behavior-change"
  ],
  "intents": [],
  "source_ids": [
    "RS-5B538054D9CC9CEC",
    "RS-D4974F543DFE0E3E"
  ],
  "evidence": [
    {
      "claim": "CIPD's evidence review recommends connecting feedback to clear goals and tracking progress rather than treating feedback as a standalone conversation.",
      "source_id": "RS-5B538054D9CC9CEC",
      "role": "supports",
      "note": "Goal difficulty and learning goals should be adapted when skills are new or tasks are complex.",
      "locator": "Practice recommendations"
    },
    {
      "claim": "CP-FIT synthesizes feedback as a cycle in which feedback must be accepted, translated into intentions and supported into behavior; failure at one stage can stop improvement.",
      "source_id": "RS-D4974F543DFE0E3E",
      "role": "supports",
      "note": "The theory was developed from health-care feedback interventions and transfer to other work is inferential.",
      "locator": "Results and feedback cycle"
    }
  ],
  "use_when": [
    "A behavior change is agreed, then disappears into a long review horizon."
  ],
  "avoid_when": [
    "Avoid surveillance disproportionate to the issue; track only what is needed for the agreed change."
  ],
  "example": "The next two change requests are checked for a pre-activation validation step instead of waiting for quarter-end appraisal.",
  "check": "There is near-term evidence about whether the feedback translated into behavior.",
  "steps": [
    "There is near-term evidence about whether the feedback translated into behavior."
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "RS-5B538054D9CC9CEC",
      "title": "Performance feedback: an evidence review",
      "url": "https://prod.cipd.org/en/knowledge/evidence-reviews/performance-feedback/"
    },
    {
      "id": "RS-D4974F543DFE0E3E",
      "title": "Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory",
      "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6486695/"
    }
  ],
  "relations": [
    {
      "from": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-0600",
      "to": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-0604",
      "type": "use_before",
      "url": "/knowledge/close-the-feedback-loop-by-reporting-the-change"
    }
  ],
  "collections": [
    {
      "id": "RC-159BAAB9ADC60CB8",
      "title": "Turn feedback into one behavior that can actually change",
      "url": "/collections/turn-feedback-into-one-behavior-that-can-actually-change"
    }
  ]
}