{
  "schema": "vedokrok.public-item.v1",
  "release_id": "MHC-RPUB-20260920-75ad787a",
  "url": "/knowledge/make-disagreement-sound-open-to-correction-without-hiding-your-point",
  "id": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-1036",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "title": "Make disagreement sound open to correction without hiding your point",
  "summary": "Being clear does not require sounding impossible to update.",
  "kind": "protocol",
  "body": "Name what you understood, acknowledge genuine common ground and state the disagreement with the certainty the evidence deserves. Research on written receptiveness supports making openness visible in language. This is not a script for appearing agreeable while ignoring the answer.",
  "limits": [
    "Do not hedge established facts into vagueness or manufacture agreement. This is for ordinary safe discussion, not a demand to remain available to abuse."
  ],
  "topics": [
    "life-02-relationships"
  ],
  "intents": [],
  "source_ids": [
    "RS-2AF6C6ECB6481C5F"
  ],
  "evidence": [
    {
      "claim": "A short language intervention increased perceived receptiveness and willingness to collaborate in the study's written exchanges.",
      "source_id": "RS-2AF6C6ECB6481C5F",
      "role": "supports",
      "note": "The study concerned written messages; sustained cooperation, truthful content and safe relationships require more.",
      "locator": "Study 4 results and section 6.2"
    }
  ],
  "use_when": [
    "You are drafting a message that disagrees with a colleague."
  ],
  "avoid_when": [
    "Do not hedge established facts into vagueness or manufacture agreement. This is for ordinary safe discussion, not a demand to remain available to abuse."
  ],
  "example": "We both need a reliable launch. My concern is that this test did not cover late arrivals. I would reconsider after that case is checked.",
  "check": "The message contains a clear disagreement and a genuine route for learning.",
  "steps": [
    "Restate the relevant concern accurately before presenting your objection.",
    "Distinguish a firm fact from an interpretation that could change.",
    "Name the evidence or condition that would lead you to revise the proposal."
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "RS-2AF6C6ECB6481C5F",
      "title": "Conversational receptiveness: Improving engagement with opposing views",
      "url": "https://receptiveness.net/assets/papers/Conversational.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "relations": [
    {
      "from": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-1036",
      "to": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-1033",
      "type": "useful_with",
      "url": "/knowledge/get-their-perspective-before-trusting-your-imagined-version"
    }
  ],
  "collections": [
    {
      "id": "RC-41F92313DB3A16E8",
      "title": "Connect, cooperate and disagree without guessing minds",
      "url": "/collections/connect-cooperate-and-disagree-without-guessing-minds"
    }
  ]
}