{
  "schema": "vedokrok.public-item.v1",
  "release_id": "MHC-RPUB-20260920-75ad787a",
  "url": "/knowledge/pre-wire-the-decision-before-the-formal-meeting",
  "id": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-9076",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "title": "Pre-wire the decision before the formal meeting",
  "summary": "The formal meeting should not be the first time critical evidence is processed.",
  "kind": "protocol",
  "body": "Brief the decision owner and material dissenters beforehand on the decision, evidence, trade-offs and unresolved risks. Use the meeting for closure, not surprise discovery.",
  "limits": [
    "Formal governance and accountability still apply. Stakeholder analysis should expose constraints and decision rights, not justify bypassing them."
  ],
  "topics": [
    "union-lead-without-authority-stakeholder-systems"
  ],
  "intents": [],
  "source_ids": [
    "RS-764F8C9A4CC71B7E"
  ],
  "evidence": [
    {
      "claim": "A meta-analysis of 72 independent studies found team information sharing positively related to performance, cohesion, decision satisfaction and knowledge integration, with meaningful moderators.",
      "source_id": "RS-764F8C9A4CC71B7E",
      "role": "supports",
      "note": "The useful form and amount of sharing depend on task, discussion structure and how information is distributed.",
      "locator": "Abstract"
    }
  ],
  "use_when": [
    "When a high-stakes meeting is expected to produce a decision but key objections are predictable and complex."
  ],
  "avoid_when": [
    "Formal governance and accountability still apply. Stakeholder analysis should expose constraints and decision rights, not justify bypassing them."
  ],
  "example": "Before a steering committee, the consultant validates the risk model with security and finance so the meeting debates the remaining trade-off rather than basic facts.",
  "check": "Known material objections have been surfaced before the meeting without privately deciding the outcome.",
  "steps": [
    "Share the decision question in advance.",
    "Test the recommendation with material dissenters.",
    "Repair missing evidence or expose unresolved disagreement.",
    "Keep the formal forum as the actual decision point."
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "RS-764F8C9A4CC71B7E",
      "title": "Information Sharing and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis",
      "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19271807/"
    }
  ],
  "relations": [
    {
      "from": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-9076",
      "to": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-9077",
      "type": "use_before",
      "url": "/knowledge/write-the-unresolved-disagreement-explicitly"
    }
  ],
  "collections": [
    {
      "id": "RC-47952011564F7728",
      "title": "Lead without formal authority: stakeholder decisions, delegation, voice, and team learning",
      "url": "/collections/lead-without-formal-authority-stakeholder-decisions-delegation-voice-and-team-learning"
    }
  ]
}