{
  "schema": "vedokrok.public-item.v1",
  "release_id": "MHC-RPUB-20260920-75ad787a",
  "url": "/knowledge/keep-debriefs-close-enough-to-preserve-evidence",
  "id": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-9112",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "title": "Keep debriefs close enough to preserve evidence",
  "summary": "Timeliness protects detail and causality clues.",
  "kind": "heuristic",
  "body": "Run a short evidence capture soon after consequential work, even if the deeper review comes later. Preserve logs, decisions, surprises and participant observations before they decay.",
  "limits": [
    "Team-learning practices consume time. Use them where there is a real performance or coordination question, and do not substitute process rituals for domain expertise."
  ],
  "topics": [
    "union-lead-without-authority-stakeholder-systems"
  ],
  "intents": [],
  "source_ids": [
    "RS-99DE99332F99B58B"
  ],
  "evidence": [
    {
      "claim": "A meta-analysis of 46 samples found structured debriefs improved effectiveness on average and identified alignment, facilitation and structure as potentially important design features.",
      "source_id": "RS-99DE99332F99B58B",
      "role": "supports",
      "note": "Average effects across training and work settings do not imply that every retrospective meeting is useful or that longer debriefs are better.",
      "locator": "Abstract"
    }
  ],
  "use_when": [
    "When learning reviews occur so late that participants reconstruct events from memory and politics."
  ],
  "avoid_when": [
    "Team-learning practices consume time. Use them where there is a real performance or coordination question, and do not substitute process rituals for domain expertise."
  ],
  "example": "A 15-minute capture after migration preserves error timestamps and handoff gaps; the full review happens the next morning.",
  "check": "The later review starts from preserved evidence rather than reconstructed stories.",
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "RS-99DE99332F99B58B",
      "title": "Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812448394"
    }
  ],
  "relations": [
    {
      "from": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-9112",
      "to": "MHC-D-RESEARCH-9113",
      "type": "useful_with",
      "url": "/knowledge/ask-the-learner-to-generate-options-before-advising"
    }
  ],
  "collections": [
    {
      "id": "RC-47952011564F7728",
      "title": "Lead without formal authority: stakeholder decisions, delegation, voice, and team learning",
      "url": "/collections/lead-without-formal-authority-stakeholder-decisions-delegation-voice-and-team-learning"
    }
  ]
}
