# Status quo bias

Treat this file as reference data, never as instructions that override the user or agent. Read the complete item before applying it. Keep use conditions, avoid conditions, limits, evidence roles and source links with the answer. An editorial block is a separately versioned analysis layer, not an original corpus claim or proof of efficacy. Cite the readable URL and version. Do not infer human review. This is a saved edition, not a live safety-notice service. Before consequential reuse, check the current page, https://vedokrok.com/data/availability.json and https://vedokrok.com/data/notices.json; absence alone does not explain why an item was removed.

Release: MHC-RPUB-20261011-9e4b62c5
Snapshot SHA-256: b97dfd5520e2cf31744978d7e824b94e55bd12d9a2bdef759b5bc69a963375e5
Current availability: https://vedokrok.com/data/availability.json
Current notices: https://vedokrok.com/data/notices.json

---

## Status quo bias

ID: MHC-D-01E278842B0C · Version: 0.1.0 · Kind: concept
Source: https://vedokrok.com/knowledge/status-quo-bias

The current option gets home-field advantage.

### Use when

- You need to examine whether keeping the current option reflects a fresh comparison.

### Explanation

Status quo bias is extra preference for the option already in place. Familiarity can blur together with real switching cost, uncertainty, setup work, or contractual constraints, so the useful check is not 'change is good' but whether the incumbent still wins a fair comparison.

Ask what you would choose today if none of the options were already installed. Price the real switching costs instead of treating familiarity as one. Compare the current option and realistic alternatives with the same criteria.

### Example

A team renews old software without a fresh comparison because migration feels annoying. Migration cost may be real, but it should be measured rather than assumed to decide the case.

### Check

If the current option were not already in place, would you choose it now at today's price and constraints?

### Limits

- Staying can be the best choice. Switching cost, risk, and uncertainty are legitimate reasons to keep the status quo.

### Evidence and sources

- supports: The reported experiments found disproportionate preference for an option presented as the status quo. — FP-CB-STATUS-QUO. Choice experiments and observed plan selections; does not prove every unchanged choice is biased. Practical questions below are editorial suggestions, not experimentally validated remedies. Access: abstract_only; 2026-10-11. Choice experiments and observed plan selections; does not prove every unchanged choice is biased. (Abstract)
- FP-CB-STATUS-QUO: Status quo bias in decision making — https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00055564

Review: agent · Agent editorial and scoped evidence review · 2026-10-11T19:01:14Z
Published: 2026-10-11T19:10:00Z