Protocol

Ask the learner to generate options before advising

Development requires the learner to do cognitive work.

When it fits

  • When coaching conversations turn into the leader solving the problem while the other person listens.

When to avoid it

  • Team-learning practices consume time. Use them where there is a real performance or coordination question, and do not substitute process rituals for domain expertise.

Why it matters

Ask for the person's diagnosis, options and preferred next step before adding advice. Then contribute missing evidence or constraints rather than replacing their reasoning.

Steps

  1. Ask what outcome they want.
  2. Ask how they diagnose the problem.
  3. Ask for at least two options.
  4. Add advice after their reasoning is visible.

An example

A junior consultant proposes two ways to reconcile duplicates before the lead explains the safer third option.

Check your result

The learner's reasoning is observable and can improve, rather than only the final answer changing.

Keep this limit in mind

  • Team-learning practices consume time. Use them where there is a real performance or coordination question, and do not substitute process rituals for domain expertise.

Connected ideas

Useful with
Coach one observable behavior at a time

Evidence and sources

Supports

A meta-analysis of workplace coaching studies reported positive overall effects on learning and performance-related organizational outcomes.

The included coaching was provided by internal or external coaches, not manager-subordinate or peer coaches; everyday leadership adaptations are editorial extrapolations.

The Effectiveness of Workplace Coaching: A Meta-Analysis of Learning and Performance Outcomes from Coaching · Abstract

All sources (1)